> Glynn wrote: > I'd like to just make one final request to remove the swig > directory before release. Otherwise, people will try > and use it.
(& they already are trying) I have no problem with this, but am not really able to test anything well right now as traveling either. If doing it I think we'd need to tag one last RC; perhaps no need to formally announce that beyond the grass-* mailing lists. I don't think to just rename it as the stable release if the tests are all good, as gdal does, but tagging rev+1 after modifying the VERSION file. (hope that makes sense, I mean re-tag, not renaming the tarball file) if removing the full swig/ dir, are there ctype options for perl/java/.net/etc users? if not, were they doomed to fail with swig anyway? MarkusN: > PS: perhaps we should move > swig/python/examples > elsewhere. yes, I thought the same thing. I'd like to see the examples/ all ported to ctypes. (I still need to learn..) cheers, Hamish _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev