No, see: http://lists.maptools.org/pipermail/proj/2009-September/004912.html
4.7.0 shipped with the wrong version number hardcoded. Promise of cupcake restored? I don't know whether the suggestion by Markus at the end of that thread got implemented? Roger GRASS GIS wrote: > > #1189: wingrass: 'g.region -l' fails > -----------------------+---------------------------------------------------- > Reporter: hamish | Owner: grass-...@… > Type: defect | Status: new > Priority: critical | Milestone: 6.4.1 > Component: Packaging | Version: svn-develbranch6 > Keywords: g.region | Platform: MSWindows XP > Cpu: x86-32 | > -----------------------+---------------------------------------------------- > > Comment(by hamish): > > Right. as seen in #1166, this is 4.7.1svn: > {{{ > Rel. 4.7.1, 23 September 2009 > }}} > > so am I right in thinking that osgeow4 is shipping development versions > instead of stable releases? bad osgeo4w. no cupcake for you. > > > Hamish > > -- > Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/1189#comment:2> > GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org> > > > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev > ----- Roger Bivand Economic Geography Section Department of Economics Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration Helleveien 30 N-5045 Bergen, Norway -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/GRASS-GIS-1189-wingrass-g-region-l-fails-tp5606275p5606354.html Sent from the Grass - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev