On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Helena Mitasova <hmit...@unity.ncsu.edu> wrote: > > On Nov 26, 2010, at 9:05 AM, Markus Neteler wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Helena Mitasova <hmit...@unity.ncsu.edu> >> wrote: >>> >>> Several changes were made in r.sim.water recently but it has still some >>> troubles on non-linux machines. >>> >>> GRASS64: it runs on linux, but gives Segmentation fault on Mac and Windows >>> Glynn has fixed the segmentation fault problem in GRASS7, I believe it is >>> r42402(?) >>> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/42402 >>> but the fix was not backported to GRASS6 develbranch or GRASS64, so those >>> two do not run on Mac or Windows >> >> >> I have backported r42402 to GRASS 6.5. >> Please try - if it helps, we can backport to 6.4, too. > > I just updated and recompiled GRASS65 and it runs well at least on Mac. > So yes please backport to 6.4 too.
I have done so in r44518. > what is going into GRASS6.4.1? everything in GRASS65 or only a selected > subset of fixes? Only selected things from 6.5 > I am asking because the GUI in GRASS65 has many improvements that make > running GRASS through GUI much more efficient. I dunno but I understood that the *GUI* is in complete sync (the other files not). >> Is there another changeset to be backported? > > r43599 for v.surf.rst is in GRASS65 so it should go into GRASS64 (but I have > never tested this one). The entire z support was not backported. Done so now. Still there is this warning main.c:706: warning: passing argument 41 of ‘IL_init_params_2d’ from incompatible pointer type /home/neteler/grass64_release/dist.x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/include/grass/interpf.h:82: note: expected ‘struct FILE *’ but argument is of type ‘char *’ > thanks a lot and it would be great to see GRASS6.4.1 soon so that we can > install and test it before > everybody leaves for holidays I agree. cheers Markus _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev