Hi, 2011/2/20 Hamish <hamis...@yahoo.com>: > Helmut wrote: >> i can confirm this with your recent changes in svn with >> r45429 etc. for grass6-develbranch. > > fwiw, that needs to be reverted, then audited and real fixes > committed piecemeal. it's a collection of private patches and > hacks to get it to run on the osgeo4w stack, not project wide > solutions. e.g. it simply comments out a problematic autoconf > search for geos, and a bunch more like that.
I agree that some changes need to be fixed/reverted. Anyway 80% of changes are relevant, so I do not feel that it should be reverted all. The winGRASS packaging is broken for more then 10 days, I don't think that this commit made situation worse than it is now. Unfortunately I will have time for it on Tuesday not earlier. Martin -- Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
