Soeren wrote: > > > > Should such a strong external dependency really be > > > > considered? Glynn: > > > GDAL is already almost mandatory. Hamish: > > the bit I worry about is putting so much of the core > > functionality onto a 3rd party sole-supplier over which > > we have limited control. Markus: > ... especially in the light of this change: > http://fwarmerdam.blogspot.com/2011/06/joining-google.html
hmmm.. interesting. well I am not too worried about the future of GDAL, it has a good community around it. What I wonder though is who will take the reigns of PROJ.4? it's already a bit under- resourced and if there's less FW to go around, I suppose his energy would veer towards GDAL first. Hamish _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
