Hi, 2011/11/10 Markus Metz <markus.metz.gisw...@googlemail.com>: >> probably I would replace `modules` with something more appropriate. >> `Modules` doesn't not mean python modules in this sense. What about >> `components` or ...? > > Why not keep the name `gui_modules`? There would not be regular python > modules, but gui-specific modules (ps.map interface, map calculator, > georectifier, v.clean interface, import guis etc).
I think it's not important to stress word `gui` in the `modules` name. It's located in `*gui*/wxpython`, I think it's quite clear that they are the gui modules. There are other packages with gui modules like `lmgr` or `mapdisp` which are related to the core component of the wxGUI. The `modules` should stress that there are non-core gui modules formed as packages. These packages (eg. `vdigit`) implements given wxGUI component like vector digitizer or georectifier. That was the main reason why I suggested `components` or something similar as a name for this directory (or package). Martin -- Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
