Hi, The suggested naming scheme sounds reasonable. Following this scheme, modules should named like this?:
t.*: t.create t.sample t.topology ... t.rast.*: t.rast.aggregate t.rast.to.rast3 t.rast.mapcalc ... t.rast3.*: t.rast3.mapcalc t.rast3.extract t.rast3.list ... t.vect.*: t.vect.what.strds t.vect.observe.strds t.vect.extract ... Does this sounds correct and reduces confusion? Best regards Soeren Am 29.03.2012 18:36 schrieb "Markus Neteler" <nete...@osgeo.org>: > 2012/3/29 Martin Landa <landa.mar...@gmail.com>: > > Hi, > > > > 2011/10/20 Sören Gebbert <soerengebb...@googlemail.com>: > >> with the temporal extension i introduce new datatypes to grass7: > ... > >> The purpose of the t.* modules is to ... > > This is the right prefix... while > > > I would like to open the discussion about this topic again, before > > tgis extension will be announced and users will start to use it. I > > would suggest to use only *one* prefix (`t.`) for TGIS. To extend > > current list of prefixes (r., v., etc) with so many new prefixes which > > are related to the one topic (in this case temporal GIS) is not good > > idea I think. Moreover it will make user manual less readable [1] - > > see t.*, tr.* and so on. I would propose rename eg `tr.` to `t.rast.`, > > and so on. > > .. I agree with Martin that we currently get a confusing list of new > prefixes which are not in line with the existing naming scheme. > > Markus >
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev