Anna Kratochvílová wrote: > PS - There is a similar problem with Python version (required 2.4). > Some interesting features start with 2.5 but usually we can live > without it. Any opinions?
I see no reason to support 2.4, and at least one reason to require at least 2.5 (the "with" statement). Requiring 2.6 would allow us to start work on forward compatibility with Python 3.x. -- Glynn Clements <gl...@gclements.plus.com> _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
