Stefan, I think you should file a ticket for this,
Helena On Apr 22, 2013, at 4:37 AM, SBL wrote: > Hi > > I am struggeling a bit with r.filnulls on a big raster (60,000 x 50,000 > cells) with lots of "NULL" areas (ca. 52,000 holes). > > In trac I provided a patch for speeding-up r.fillnulls ( #1938 > <http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/1938> ). But it still feels pretty slow > on such a big raster... > > In particular, I was stumbeling upon the following waring message > > > > If number of points is below 600, then both segmax and npmin are set to > "pointsnumber". So, from r.fillnulls segmax was set to 40 (and not 80, like > the warning message indicates...). Then I tested in v.surf.rst with a hole > with 1033 existing data points on the edge, and now I am a little confused: > > If I set > > I get the following Warning message: > > And interpolation is done within 6 seconds. > > I get the same message if I set: > > But now processing takes now 16 seconds... > > The warning message above changes to > > when I set: > > Strange that it is possible because in the GUI it says npmin has to be > greater than segmax... > But processing time is down on 6 secs again... > > With: > > I get the expected error message, that npmin has to greater than segmax. > > Finally, I set segmax and npmin to the "default" in r.fillnulls for holes > with pointnumber >= 600: > > Now processing takes 55 seconds!!! > This is especially confusing because during the tests with npmin = 1033 I > got the following warning message in addition: > > But actually, processing was nearly 10 times faster then with npmin=300! > > Sorry for the long post! > > Summary: > Something seems to be confused in the way v.surf.rst handles the user input > and gives warning/error messages... > > > Shall I file a ticket? > > > Cheers > Stefan > > P.S.: BTW, using the "dmin" in r.fillnulls could improve the processing > speed for bigger holes some more. Maybe it is worth giving the user the > option to set dmi also in r.fillnulls? > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Grass-7-segmax-and-npmin-confused-in-r-fillnulls-v-surf-rst-tp5048683.html > Sent from the Grass - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev