Maybe it just waits for somebody to put it there, we would like to see it in the core as well.
Do we need for some kind of procedure to decide (e.g. through PSC action, verify that it has been thoroughly tested) and to designate a developer who moves the code from add-ons to the core? Helena Helena Mitasova Associate Professor Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences 2800 Faucette Drive, Rm. 1125 Jordan Hall North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC 27695-8208 hmit...@ncsu.edu "All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.” On Jan 19, 2014, at 2:48 PM, Markus Neteler wrote: > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Margherita Di Leo > <dileomargher...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Johannes Radinger >>> So for the meanwhile I can use the workaround with compiling r.stream.* >>> directly with the source for G7, however maybe other users in future are >>> also interested in using these add-ons and will face similar problems I did. >> >> >> sorry if OT but did I miss something? I thought r.stream* were going to >> core..? > > I thought the same... > > Markus > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
