On 31 March 2014 01:08, Vaclav Petras <wenzesl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, >
Hi > do you think that GRASS GIS Addons [1] should go to Ohloh [2]? I do, because > they are part of the project and should be tracked. > +1 > GRASS GIS Addons can be added as additional repository for GRASS GIS project > or they can be a separated project at Ohloh. Some projects went this way of > having plugins/extension/addons separated. The reasons for this might be > that the developers group, used languages or contribution frequency can be > really different. What do you think? Or do you know some other ways on > Ohloh? (I don't know much about Ohloh.) > I'd like to see it separated from the main code > The question also is if grass-addons/ or grass-addons/grass7 or something > else should be used. I vote for grass-addons, although there is some > duplication. But there are some distinct things and it follows the idea of > having there 64 and trunk. But I don't have a strong opinion on this either. > I also vote for grass-addons > Vaclav > > > [1] http://svn.osgeo.org/grass/grass-addons/ > [2] https://www.ohloh.net > > > PS: I was considering for a second if to add also 70 branch besides trunk > and the answer is clearly no. This would be definitively a huge duplication > (and thus nonsense for Ohloh). > +1, also because most of the code should pass from trunk.... -- ciao Luca http://gis.cri.fmach.it/delucchi/ www.lucadelu.org _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
