Michael Barton wrote: > While I agree with this overall, I don�t see why we need 2 GRASS > branches. What is the value in 2 GRASS 6 branches that cannot be > achieved with 1 branch?
If 6.x is going to maintenance-only, we don't need two branches for it. Just a release branch, with releases as tagged revisions on that branch. -- Glynn Clements <gl...@gclements.plus.com> _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
