Martin Landa wrote > Hi, > > 2014-07-02 13:22 GMT+02:00 Moritz Lennert <
> mlennert@.worldonline > >: >> [Starting a new thread as this is an important point on its own. Original >> mail is [1].] >> >> On 02/07/14 01:10, Glynn Clements wrote:> But in the longer term, should >> we >> be claiming to support a platform >>> for which we appear to have no active developers? >> >> I think that the question merits discussion. In my teaching experience it >> has been very helpful to have a MS Windows version to allow students with >> MS >> Windows machines to install the software on these machines. I also have >> colleagues who, for different reasons, are quite resistant to installing >> another OS on their machines, but would like to use GRASS. So, generally, >> I >> think that there should be a MS Windows port of GRASS. > > we simply _must_ support as much as possible GRASS on Windows. It's > crucial for us, without users there is no need for developing > software. > > Martin I concur with Martin! supporting winGRASS is a must. maybe let's spend some money to fix some crucial OS-depending issues... ----- best regards Helmut -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/future-of-GRASS-for-Windows-was-Re-GRASS-SVN-r60679-grass-trunk-lib-python-script-tp5149214p5149221.html Sent from the Grass - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
