I was wondering what that mean, so I looked it up and found this: https://communities.coverity.com/thread/2303
-Bob -----Original Message----- From: grass-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:grass-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Martin Landa Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 11:07 AM To: Vaclav Petras Cc: GRASS developers list Subject: Re: [GRASS-dev] Fwd: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for grass 2014-10-20 20:02 GMT+02:00 Vaclav Petras <wenzesl...@gmail.com>: > num_of_rings = *nrings; > > I'm not sure what "tainted scalar" means but isn't this just hiding the > issue, so that the checking tool cannot find it? AFAIU, the problem is dynamically computed value in loop condition. It could be anything, so it's "tainted". Does anyone knows about better solution? Martin -- Martin Landa * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
