On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Michael Barton <michael.bar...@asu.edu> wrote: > > Probably nothing to be done about this since r.shaded.relief goes back a long time. But a more sensible renaming would have the script now called r.chaded.relief renamed to simply r.relief. Then the modules that drape a colored map onto a relief map could be called x.shaded.relief, x.shadedrelief, or something like that. > That's an interesting option. I'm not sure if I like it but it's worth exploring. If we go even further we get:
r.shaded.relief -> r.relief r.shadedmap -> r.shade d.shadedmap -> d.shade Vaclav > Michael > > > On Nov 28, 2014, at 1:31 AM, Vaclav Petras <wenzesl...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Martin Landa <landa.mar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> 2014-11-27 18:12 GMT+01:00 Markus Neteler <nete...@osgeo.org>: >> >> > Then it should be renamed. >> > >> > We cannot add continuously new scripts with similar names... >> >> +1 >> > You mean r.shaded.relief versus [dr].shadedmap? > > r.shaded.relief should probably stay the same. [dr].shadedmap could be changed. I don't particularly like the name from the beginning but I didn't get any better idea than keeping the name [dr].shadedmap. There are just two ideas worth mentioning and they does not seem different enough. First is [dr].shade.rast(er) as in "put shade on raster" and the second is [dr].rast(er).shade which is inspired by d.vect.thematic or d.rast.arrow). > > The possible combinations mentioned above are: > > d.rast.shade > r.rast.shade > d.shade.rast > r.shade.rast > d.raster.shade > r.raster.shade > d.shade.raster > r.shade.raster > > Vaclav
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev