#2409: last call for options keys consolidation ----------------------------------+----------------------------------------- Reporter: martinl | Owner: grass-dev@… Type: task | Status: new Priority: blocker | Milestone: 7.0.0 Component: Default | Version: unspecified Keywords: standardized options | Platform: Unspecified Cpu: Unspecified | ----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Comment(by hcho): Replying to [comment:111 annakrat]: > Replying to [comment:108 martinl]: > > > Personally I would tend to rename just > > * element name `raster_3d` (or `raster3d`) > * module options e.g. `d.legend raster_3d` > > > I would not touch names of the modules, some of them already use shorten names, eg. `d.rast.leg`, so I would keep `rast3d`. Similarly I would not touch python module names. > > > > Any opinion from other devs? > > I don't really like the underscore, I would go with raster3d, I think we can manage to type raster3d because 3D rasters are generally not used as often as rasters. I agree. I don't like the underscore either. Maybe, the parser could treat numbers just like the underscore so that we can shorten raster3d as r3. > > I would keep the names of modules as they are now. Like Martin mentioned, I don't think we need to change module names if we go for raster3d because other modules already use short names. -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/2409#comment:113> GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org> _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev