On Jan 9, 2015, at 3:51 AM, 
grass-dev-requ...@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:grass-dev-requ...@lists.osgeo.org> 
wrote:

From: Moritz Lennert 
<mlenn...@club.worldonline.be<mailto:mlenn...@club.worldonline.be>>
To: grass-dev <grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org>>
Date: January 9, 2015 at 2:59:08 AM MST
Subject: [GRASS-dev] future of thematic mapping in GRASS


Using the occasion of #2522 [1] (BTW I agree with these changes), I would like 
to launch a discussion on the future of thematic mapping in GRASS (post 
grass7). I think we need a general discussion about what exactly is still 
needed. Several elements were included directly into d.vect (variable size of 
symbols and widths of lines, width-, size- and rgb-column). I actually think 
that maybe a more efficient approach in the long run might be to use these 
elements for thematic mapping of vectors. Something like this:

* use v.class to define classes; extend to allow writing class attribution to 
attribute table
* use an extended v.colors or a new v.colors.classes to define colors for 
classes, possibly using [2]
* use d.vect to display all of this
* use a new d.legend.vector to display legend info (including class 
frequencies).

Python scripts could be used to bind these modules together.

What do you think ?

Moritz


[1] http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/2522
[2] http://colorbrewer2.org/



I agree that we should do something like this. I always thought of 
d.vect.thematic as a temporary solution until better integrated thematic 
mapping could be implemented.

Michael

____________________
C. Michael Barton
Director, Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity
Professor of Anthropology, School of Human Evolution & Social Change
Head, Graduate Faculty in Complex Adaptive Systems Science
Arizona State University

voice:  480-965-6262 (SHESC), 480-965-8130/727-9746 (CSDC)
fax: 480-965-7671 (SHESC),  480-727-0709 (CSDC)
www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton, http://csdc.asu.edu



_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Reply via email to