I would like to add a +1 about how elegance helps adapting and eventually adopting.
This is certainly to add to the group of discussions on user workflows and user efficiency designs. On 21 January 2015 at 12:28, Michael Barton <michael.bar...@asu.edu> wrote: > In fact, wxPython for Mac at least, doesn’t look very Mac like. The > windows versions I’ve seen don’t look particularly close to the current > version of Windows either. This is unsurprising since wxPython focuses on > cross-platform functionality. It needs to work the same across multiple > platforms. To do that, it has a default appearance that sacrifices some > degree of design elements that would make it look more like the platform it > is running on. Just going with the default look in a GUI platform is not > necessarily a virtue because it tends to be a lowest common > denominator. However, wxPython also allows users to alter that default to > some degree. It has ways of specifying fonts and colors that can propagate > in equivalent ways across all platforms, for example. Giving GRASS a > distinctive visual appearance is not a vice to be avoided, as long as both > function and visual elements propagate in an equivalent way across multiple > platforms. Design elegance can enhance functionality as well. Of course, > designing an elegant as well as functional interface across multiple > platforms is challenging. The iconography designed for GRASS, with a visual > grammar, is a nice example of combining elegant design with functionality. > We don’t always have the skills or time or other resources to do this > throughout the program, of course. And interface defaults in wxPython are > better than poorly executed customizations, which may function > inconsistently as well as look bad. But interface customization and > enhancement doesn’t need to be avoided on principle. > > Michael > ____________________ > C. Michael Barton > Director, Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity > Professor of Anthropology, School of Human Evolution & Social Change > Head, Graduate Faculty in Complex Adaptive Systems Science > Arizona State University > > voice: 480-965-6262 (SHESC), 480-965-8130/727-9746 (CSDC) > fax: 480-965-7671 (SHESC), 480-727-0709 (CSDC) > www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton, http://csdc.asu.edu > > > > > On Jan 20, 2015, at 11:09 PM, Vaclav Petras <wenzesl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Michael Barton <michael.bar...@asu.edu> > wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Jan 20, 2015, at 9:49 PM, Vaclav Petras <wenzesl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:40 PM, Michael Barton <michael.bar...@asu.edu> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Jan 20, 2015, at 9:22 PM, Vaclav Petras <wenzesl...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Vaclav Petras <wenzesl...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > I'm not really concerned about splash screen but I think we should >>> change the Welcome screen/window. My suggestion is to simply remove the >>> picture and the sentence "Welcome to...open source GIS". This will save a >>> lot of vertical space which will be great advantage for small screens, for >>> example virtual box instances (the default screen size I got with >>> VirtualBox and OSGeoLive was not enough to accommodate this window). The >>> other reason why we need to save vertical space is actually a need to add >>> more things. There is "one row" for error message but I would like to see >>> this replaced by a block with info box for errors, warnings and general >>> help messages (e.g., what to do next). >>> >>> >>> IMHO, this kind of stuff does not belong on the spash screen. Errors >>> and warnings (hopefully there are none) already show up in the terminal >>> window, and we have help available on the main start up screen. >>> >>> The splash is an entry—and an advertisement—for GRASS. Looking nice is >>> actually important, but especially for a piece of high end visual software. >>> I don’t think we should make the first view that people have when they >>> start GRASS be boring or ugly just to accommodate tiny screens. It would be >>> nice if there are any with graphic design expertise who could weigh in here. >>> >>> The splash screen is replaced shortly by the (much more prosaic) main >>> start up screen anyway. So why not keep it something that has visual appeal. >>> >>> Sorry for the confusion. I'm speaking about welcome/start/setup/ >> window which actually appears *before* the splash screen and it has an old >> school picture which just eats vertical space. See the following links (or >> start GRASS :-). >> >> http://grass.osgeo.org/grass71/manuals/grass_start.png >> http://grass.osgeo.org/grass71/manuals/helptext.html >> >> >> OK. I was talking about the Medieval map, which was the start of the >> thread. I’d suggested the first real world map, with some welcome text. >> Even better would be doing something with visual impact with a historic map >> or some other display (we already have OpenGL loaded…). But that would take >> someone with the needed graphic skills. A colorful map and some good text >> is still tasteful. >> >> I also agree that the start screen needs some love too. It is boring >> grey and has a dated image at the top—which is what it seems you are >> talking about, right? >> >> Right. > > >> Your nice green lettering on a light background would give it a nice >> clean look. FWIW, it would be classy to have the entire dialog an equally >> lighter shade too, with green or dark grey lettering in a nice font for the >> text outside of the wxPython control widgets. >> >> I still wouldn’t put error messages on this dialog because it already >> has a lot of information and controls, and we need people to focus on what >> is needed to run GRASS. Maybe a more prominent help button because no one >> seems to notice it. >> >> Thanks for the feedback, however I think we need the complete > opposite. Nobody reads the help even if the browser would open > automatically. The help included in the dialog directly (not in the > tooltips), in the form of messages focusing on "what to do next", is the > right way to communicate with user. This seems as a general (long term) > trend which is widely accepted and I consider it good. > > I actually already applied this when I replaced several error dialogs by > the error like with red text for cases when gisdbase is not valid. (This > avoids user being bashed by error dialogs when gisdbase is empty or the dir > was moved.) Error messages and tips are obviously helpful for running GRASS > while some non-boring backgrounds and pictures could be distracting. > > Removing the green text and the picture will buy space for additional > line or two for info and error messages while keeping the dialog smaller > than it is now. Another advantage of not having any picture at all is that > it will never get old (as happened to the current one). > > The shade of gray you see should be your system color. If you believe > you see different one then it is likely a wxPython/wxWidgets bug. GRASS > GIS, as any other SW should respect the system settings as much as > possible, for example for aesthetics and accessibility reasons. Even the > green text on start button is against accessibility rules. Same with font, > wxPython is trying to use default system font. If custom font would be > used, there is no guaranty that it will be accessible on particular > machine. For example, I have really nice font by default for all the > standard widgets, just the green text (with custom font) is not really nice. > > Vaclav > > Michael >> >> ____________________ >> C. Michael Barton >> Director, Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity >> Professor of Anthropology, School of Human Evolution & Social Change >> Head, Graduate Faculty in Complex Adaptive Systems Science >> Arizona State University >> >> voice: 480-965-6262 (SHESC), 480-965-8130/727-9746 (CSDC) >> fax: 480-965-7671 (SHESC), 480-727-0709 (CSDC) >> www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton, http://csdc.asu.edu >> >> >> >>> I hope to find some time to change this tomorrow before RC2 if there >>> are no voices against. I will remove the picture (including its ISIS >>> alternative) and the green (motto) text. I hope to find some good title >>> text for this welcome/startup/setup screen/window. >>> >>> >>> Please do not mess with the splash screen until we’ve heard from >>> others. >>> >>> My 2 cents worth >>> >>> Michael >>> >>> >>> >>> With this it could be interesting to revise naming of the following >>> page where filename, title and content don't match. >>> >>> http://grass.osgeo.org/grass71/manuals/helptext.html >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Michael Barton <michael.bar...@asu.edu> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > I agree with Bringing… rather than Opening… >>> > >>> > Bringing is better English and many people would not get the double >>> meaning of Opening… >>> > >>> > I still like a map for the splash screen. Of the 2 logos you did, I >>> think the white background looks classier. >>> > >>> As I said, I'm more interested in changing page titles then the splash >>> screen , however I like the idea of some simple splash screen. The white >>> background image I did could be used in trac and in manual. I'm just not >>> sure if it is ok that it is not text but image. For the manual it should be >>> anyway replaced by something which contains version of GRASS and the name >>> of the module (which should be manageable since page title tag contains the >>> module name). >>> >>> Vaclav >>> >>> > Michael >>> > >>> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 4:50 AM, Nikos Alexandris < >>> n...@nikosalexandris.net> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> On 20.01.2015 11:38, Martin Landa wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> 2015-01-20 6:18 GMT+01:00 Helena Mitasova <hmit...@ncsu.edu>: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I like this one - I think it well represents what GRASS is. >>> (perhaps GRASS GIS?) >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> GRASS. Bringing advanced geospatial technologies to the world. >>> >>> >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> >>> >>> Much more better than the current: >>> >>> >>> >>> The world's leading open source GIS >>> >> >>> >> What about >>> >> >>> >> "GRASS, opening advanced geospatial technologies to the world." >>> >> >>> > >>> > I like more the "Bringing advanced..." than "Opening advanced..." >>> because it has emphasis on features. Not everybody understands advantages >>> of openness (yet). >>> > >>> > Note that it should be "GRASS GIS", not "GRASS" as much as possible. >>> > >>> > We can just create a image with logo+GRASS GIS+motto which could be >>> used as splash and perhaps elsewhere too, for example in headers/titles of >>> pages where we have just the logo and not name (Trac, manual). See >>> attachment for suggestion. >>> > >>> > Vaclav >>> >>> > > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev > -- ----
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev