I'm not a fan of "all lower case sans serif" logos and graphics. I may even like it visually but it is current trend which everybody is putting everywhere and it started to be boring.
For GRASS GIS, I would imagine something more classic like the previous proposals. However, this is more a warning. For splash6, I would suggest to remove website link, version and revision. It is just a clutter. Version and revision could be hard to get and link wouldn't be clickable anyway. Otherwise, I think that splash6 is better than splash5. http://grasswiki.osgeo.org/wiki/File:GRASSGIS_splash5.jpg http://grasswiki.osgeo.org/wiki/File:GRASSGIS_splash6.jpg On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Nikos Alexandris <n...@nikosalexandris.net> wrote: > On 29.01.2015 15:58, Vincent Bain wrote: > >> Le mercredi 28 janvier 2015 à 17:42 +0200, Nikos Alexandris a écrit : >> >>> The ones @ >>> >>> <http://grasswiki.osgeo.org/wiki/User:NikosA#Ideas_for_an_ >>> alternative_GRASS-Wiki_logogram> >>> are for the Wiki... !? If anyone is interested. >>> >> >> Sorry Nikos, I missed your suggestion. >> Perhaps it's an opportunity to bet on a similar output, again for >> consistency (see attached file). >> > > Yes, absolutely a winner! Awesome font :-) > > > Nikos > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev >
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
