On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 11:16:21AM +0100, Moritz Lennert wrote: > Am 07.03.2015 10:43 schrieb Markus Metz: > >On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Patrice Dumas <pertu...@free.fr> wrote: > >>Hello, > >> > >>Here is a rewrite of the v.points.cog module in python. > > > >I think v.points.cog is superseded by v.centerpoint which offers cog > >as well as other kinds of centerpoints. > > AFAIR, v.points.cog offers the possibility to get cog for clusters > of points defined by an attribute. v.centerpoint does not offer > this. So, either it might be interesting to add this to > v.centerpoint, or to rewrite v.points.cog as a wrapper around > v.centerpoint.
I think that using v.centerpoint in v.points.cog would be the best, as it would then be possible to add a pcenter= option to v.points.cog to be able to use v.centerpoint other possibilities. I can do that, but I think that it is best to first commit the translation of v.points.cog as is and in a second step add the call to v.centerpoints instead of duplicating in v.points.cog what v.centerpoints does. Is it ok? -- Pat _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
