#1660: RFE: add new batch= command line option to main grass7 startup script
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  hamish       |       Owner:  grass-dev@…              
      Type:  enhancement  |      Status:  closed                   
  Priority:  normal       |   Milestone:  7.0.0                    
 Component:  Startup      |     Version:  svn-trunk                
Resolution:  duplicate    |    Keywords:  GRASS_BATCH_JOB          
  Platform:  All          |         Cpu:  All                      
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Changes (by wenzeslaus):

  * status:  new => closed
  * resolution:  => duplicate


Comment:

 Replying to [comment:1 wenzeslaus]:
 > It would be nice if it would support not only scripts but any executable
 including GRASS modules.
 >
 > Also the question is how the parameters would be passed to the process.
 >
 > The whole command in one parameter (the question is how quoted
 parameters would be passed):
 {{{
 grass --batch="g.region -p"
 }}}

 Passing parameters is crucial enhancement in comparison to
 `GRASS_BATCH_JOB`. However, this syntax would not work for more
 complicated cases due to parsing issues.
 >
 > Alternatively, parameters after `--batch=...` can be passed to the
 subprocess.
 >
 {{{
 grass --batch=g.region -p
 }}}

 This is strange hybrid which is not necessary. `grass7` command is not
 using syntax with `=` (unlike modules) and separate module parameters
 would anyway break the rules. See #2579 for better suggestions.
 >
 >
 > > perhaps with that done GRASS_BATCH_JOB could be retired for GRASS 7.0?
 (or would there still be some reason to keep it as an alternate method?)
 >
 > The only reason to keep it would be backward compatibility and it think
 this is not concern here considering the audience (size and type). Perhaps
 both can be for some time in trunk but not in release.

 `GRASS_BATCH_JOB` is part of 7.0.0, so it will stay there. But once this
 is implemented, I don't see any advantage in `GRASS_BATCH_JOB`.

 Closing this as a duplicate of #2579 (which I opened not remembering this
 one). Leaving the other one as primary as the discussion is more developed
 there (including patch).

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/1660#comment:2>
GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org>

_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Reply via email to