On 14-09-15 11:39, GRASS GIS wrote:
+1 Between the two options, I would prefer it to respect the region (following the common approach in GRASS). But I agree that having both options would even be better.#2625: r.stats's nsteps is not region-sensitive --------------------------+----------------------------- Reporter: martinl | Owner: grass-dev@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 7.0.2 Component: Raster | Version: svn-trunk Resolution: | Keywords: r.stats, nsteps CPU: Unspecified | Platform: Unspecified --------------------------+-----------------------------Comment (by mlennert): Replying to [comment:2 martinl]: > Any opinion / feedback? Thanks. Both region-specific bins and map-specific bins can be useful. The latter allow easier comparison between different subregions, whereas the former allow getting the number of bins asked for in each subregion. So, the ideal solution IMHO would be to have both.
In the meantime, the fact that bins are calculated on the entire map's value range should be at least documented explicitly.
The documentation now says that "analysis uses the current geographic region (g.region) and mask settings (r.mask)". So the fact that /nsteps/ does not respects this is an exception apparently (and it is an exception to the general GRASS GIS approach), which should indeed by very clearly documented.
-- Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/2625#comment:3> GRASS GIS <https://grass.osgeo.org> _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
