On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Moritz Lennert < mlenn...@club.worldonline.be> wrote:
> On 29/09/15 15:26, Newcomb, Doug wrote: > >> As an example, the new North Carolina data set ( 2014 +) , the LiDAR >> classes above 12 are being used for roads, (13) and bridges (14) . >> > > Maybe if we go for 30 or 31 we have less chance to step on other > classifications' toes. But the risk remains, so maybe the idea of > regrouping 0 and 1 as 1 is less error prone... > 0+1 > 1 sounds like a good idea and reasonable default. I will actually this again with color. It seems reasonable to store the color for vector points (if there is a lot of them) as categories. But of course the range is 0-255, we can surely move it to 1-256 but it little bit inconsistent with everything else in world regarding the RGB color handling.
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
