wenzeslaus wrote > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Helmut Kudrnovsky <
> hellik@ > > wrote: >> >> >> > >: >> >> after some quick tests of some ratser modules: it's quite responsive > and >> >> fast ... >> > >> > it would be interesting to compare with 32bit (new) and also old >> > (grass 7.0.2-1)... Ma >> >> here it is, some quick test: > > Almost twice as fast this is really good! Thanks Martin, the 64bit version > is useful in general as well. > > Helmut, do you want to try to run all tests to see if they work and if > there is some visible seed improvement as well? > > Quoting from my previous email about tests on Windows [1]: Install the > latest build of trunk for Windows. Get the latest source code: If you > don't > have Subversion on Windows, checkout the latest version on Linux (or make > distclean && svn up), zip it and unzip it on Windows. Run GRASS GIS, use > cmd line, cd into the source code dir and run all tests [2]: > > python -m grass.gunittest.main --location nc_basic_spm_grass7 > --location-type nc > > [1] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2015-February/074037.html > [2] > http://grass.osgeo.org/grass71/manuals/libpython/gunittest_running_tests.html tests are running, will post the results later. some are failing as it seems some maps have different names as expected in the tests. I suggest to link in [1] to the needed nc sample data set version for which the tests should be run. [1] https://grass.osgeo.org/grass71/manuals/libpython/gunittest_running_tests.html ----- best regards Helmut -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/wingrass-daily-buidls-addons-temporary-down-tp5240948p5241813.html Sent from the Grass - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
