hi, I've done some quick diff test with results of winGRASS7 32bit vs 64bit in the NC sample dataset:
r.slope.aspect: r.mapcalc aspect32bit - aspect64bit => 0 r.mapcalc slope32bit - slope64bit => 0 they seems to be identical. r.watershed: r.mapcalc accum32bit - accum64bit r.info map=diffaccum@accumtest +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Map: diffaccum@accumtest Date: Wed Dec 30 11:50:35 2015 | | Mapset: accumtest Login of Creator: myricaria | | Location: nc_spm_08_grass7 | | DataBase: C:\grassdata | | Title: ( diffaccum ) | | Timestamp: none | |----------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | Type of Map: raster Number of Categories: 0 | | Data Type: DCELL | | Rows: 1350 | | Columns: 1500 | | Total Cells: 2025000 | | Projection: Lambert Conformal Conic | | N: 228500 S: 215000 Res: 10 | | E: 645000 W: 630000 Res: 10 | | Range of data: min = -8.14907252788544e-010 max = 4.65661287307739e- | | | | Data Description: | | generated by r.mapcalc | | | | Comments: | | accum32bit@accumtest - accum64bit@accumtest | | | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ the results between 32bit and 64bit winGRASS seems not to be identical. any ideas if they should be identical? ----- best regards Helmut -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/results-in-winGRASS7-32bit-vs-64bit-should-they-be-identical-tp5243280.html Sent from the Grass - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev