Hi Martin, And thanks so much for your effort!
I just patched r70332 and tested in NC, where it works perfectly fine with: v.random --overwrite --verbose output=random_topo npoints=5000 v.db.addtable map=random_topo columns="elev double precision" v.out.ascii -c --overwrite --verbose input=random_topo type=point output=$HOME/test.asc columns=elev format=point v.in.ascii -b --overwrite --verbose input=$HOME/test.asc output=random_notopo skip=1 time v.what.rast --verbose map=random_notopo raster=elev_ned_30m@PERMANENT column=elev time v.what.rast --verbose map=random_topo raster=elev_ned_30m@PERMANENT column=elev BTW. during testing I noticed that v.db.addtable also requires topology level 2 (therefore I exported to ASCII and imported without topology)... Again, thanks so much! This can provide a quite efficient workflow for my colleagues with GPS-tracking data (points) in PostGIS... Cheers Stefan -----Original Message----- From: Martin Landa [mailto:landa.mar...@gmail.com] Sent: lørdag 14. januar 2017 17.06 To: Blumentrath, Stefan <stefan.blumentr...@nina.no> Cc: GRASS developers list (grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org) <grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org> Subject: Re: [GRASS-dev] v.what.rast: topology really necessary? Hi Stefan, 2017-01-11 11:38 GMT+01:00 Blumentrath, Stefan <stefan.blumentr...@nina.no>: could you try patch for v.what.rast [1]? Ma [1] https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/3249#comment:13 -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
