On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 12:00 PM Markus Neteler <nete...@osgeo.org> wrote:
> > @Vaclav Petras > Maybe a workaround for the online test system at > http://fatra.cnr.ncsu.edu/grassgistests/summary_report/ > ? > Hi Markus, the reason I didn't do that was I was hoping we either decide which one to use or release a new version of full NC SPM with the names from basic (we were quite close to it at one point :-). If I recall correctly, fatra.cnr.ncsu.edu was originally using the full dataset for maximal variability, then I switched to basic because that was what was applicable also for the piemonte_utm32_wgs84_grass7 dataset (which hides under stdmaps link). This all goes back to the idea of testing framework using different datasets: 1) full NC SPM (marked nc in lib/python/gunittest/multirunner.py and at fatra), 2) any Standardized Sample Datasets [1] (marked stdmaps; fatra uses piemonte as an example). 3) any dataset (marked all; fatra uses an empty XY loc) This marking is not part of the tests. I never had time to implement that. Part of the mechanism is already in place, although I think there needs to be some clarification on specifying tests which can run in any location (a "universal" test) versus running all tests regardless of their specified location. I changed the location on fatra to full NC SPM and did the rename as you suggested. I don't know how many tests does this affect, but in any case tomorrow we will know if I at least set the things correctly. Best, Vaclav [1] https://grasswiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GRASS_GIS_Standardized_Sample_Datasets
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev