On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 at 15:27, Stefan Blumentrath <stefan.blumentr...@nina.no> wrote: > > Dear all, > Dear al,,
> In general, I do agree with Moritz on this. > > In addition to the risk of more fragmented communication, I do appreciate the > fact that ML-discussion is archived. Furthermore, GitHub discussion seems to > be a feature that locks us more into GitHub and would it make more > complicated if we should be forced to move to another platform (given the > proprietary nature of GitHub). > > I do also see that some discussion has moved to github issues/PRs, but that > is probably only natural, esp. when point of the discussion is specifics of > an implementation / change. > > However, to address both valid issues (demand for web-based forum and a > coherent communication), we could probably to three things: > 1. Encourage all contributors to discuss/mention more significant changes on > the ML. > 2. Promote nabble > [http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Grass-Dev-f3991897.html] on our github > repository > 3. Check whether it would be feasible to sign up to nabble / ML with > OAuth/github to make integration more seamless. I have no idea though if this > would be feasible at all. Maybe OSGeo admins know?... > I also agree with Mortiz and Stefan > Cheers > Stefan > ciao Luca _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
