The GDAL 3.3 conflict has been resolved. Thanks Markus M!
I have no further objections to proceed with 7.8.6 RC1.
Cheers,
Nicklas
On Tuesday, 18 May 2021, 21:22:22 CEST, Nicklas Larsson via grass-dev
<grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
I think we should wait for an agreement of the PR [1] addressing the GDAL 3.3
conflict with GRASS [2], which will become a trivial yet serious issue when
GDAL 3.3 becomes more widely distributed.
Best,
Nicklas
[1] https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pull/1567
[2] https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/issues/1563 On Tuesday, 18 May 2021,
09:49:31 CEST, Markus Neteler <nete...@osgeo.org> wrote:
On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 11:43 AM Moritz Lennert
<mlenn...@club.worldonline.be> wrote:
> On 6/05/21 10:29, Stefan Blumentrath wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I did a quick check with GRASS 7.8.5:
> > https://gist.github.com/ninsbl/8051f51d372b565ca6f5a29b480d2463
> > ~ 25 AddOn modules are affected for various reasons.
> > Most common issues are lack of manual pages...
> >
> > For some it may be fixed on the addon site, but for modules with libraries,
> > g.extention might have to be fixed (did not look at the details yet).
>
> Problems that are caused by the addons themselves should obviously not
> be considered blockers of a release, so we should focus on the issues
> directly caused by g.extension.
With the recent PR merges and backports I assume that the addon
installation problem has be addressed (thanks to all involved!).
May we go towards 7.8.6 RC1 at this point?
Markus
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
