Le 16 août 2021 18:20:42 GMT+02:00, Veronica Andreo <veroand...@gmail.com> a écrit : >Hi all, > >El vie, 6 ago 2021 a las 4:29, Vaclav Petras (<wenzesl...@gmail.com>) >escribió: > >> Are we ready to create the 8.0 release branch? >> > >Seems we are!! > >Once we create it, we will need to backport (cherry-pick) updates from the >> master branch when needed. >> >> Please see the following for the individual issues we still have and post >> here if you see some priorities. >> >> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 5:24 PM Vaclav Petras <wenzesl...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>> Windows build & test is just bad (no bug or PR so far?), >>> >>> >>> Can someone give an update on that, please? >>> >> >> >>> #1683 is not merged yet, but missing sh in the test environment is not a >>> blocker in this case. >>> >> >> https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pull/1683 >> >> Tests are running! >> >> >>> CentOS is too >>> >>>> old (#1709) & needs auto tools update to fix it (or at least env >>>> variable in build script as I just have done to enable testing in >>>> #1501), >>> >>> >>> ...or CentOS 8, CentOS Stream, or remove the CentOS test. >>> >>> https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/issues/1709#issuecomment-880215427 >>> >> >> It would be better if Autotools are updated, but CentOS build works now. >> Are there any pressing issues? >> >> >>> I would also strongly advocate merging ctypes upgrade before 8.0 >>>> >>> >>> Seems to be close to being finished too. >>> >> >> ctypes update is closer everyday, but not finished yet. Maybe not needed >> for 8.0? >> >> https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pull/1651 >> > >Milestone was changed to 8.2 and Nicklas suggest to move forward with >release branch 8 > >> >> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 4:28 AM Maris Nartiss <maris....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> 2021-07-27 18:26 GMT+03:00, Vaclav Petras <wenzesl...@gmail.com>: >>> > >>> > From what has the milestone 8.0 and is not mentioned below and is >>> major, I >>> > see only #1454 and #1501 which are related to band references. Maybe we >>> > should again consider reverting the band references in order to get 8.0 >>> out >>> > or how do you see the status of #1454 and #1501, Martin and Maris? >>> > >>> > https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/milestone/4 >>> > https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pull/1454 >>> > https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pull/1501 >>> >>> For #1454 the main remaining (and unsolvable) issue is semantics of a >>> mapset layout and its management functions. I just commited a more >>> clean workaround and thus it should be ready for a merge. A proper >>> solution will have to wait for GRASS 9 when we could reorganize mapset >>> structure and thus also clean-up naming, handling functions etc. >>> >> >> #1501 (Integrate band references into portable signature files) is close >> to being merged. >> > >this one was merged just after you posted this > >#1454 (TGIS DB v3 backward compatible with v2) has perhaps lower priority >> since there is both upgrade and downgrade. >> >> As for issues linked to the milestone, please review what is there. See >> what needs to stay there and what can be moved. For example, all issues >> which are features and are not changing existing API can be moved to 8.2 >> milestone. >> >> https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/milestone/4 >> > > If no further objections I'd suggest to move forward with grass8 release >branch creation
+1 Moritz _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev