> On 26 Jan 2023, at 15:07, Nicklas Larsson <n_lars...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> The question now is, are there any objections to do the same treatment to
> grass-addons)?
> There are three PRs in-store [3-5] to make that happen.
>
I understand there are no objections to apply clang-format and do the general
trailing-whitespace/EOF cleanup in grass-addons.
I will in short proceed and merge the related PRs [3-5].
>
>
> [1] https://pre-commit.com <https://pre-commit.com/>
> [2] https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pull/2765
> <https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pull/2765>
> [3] https://github.com/OSGeo/grass-addons/pull/852
> <https://github.com/OSGeo/grass-addons/pull/852>
> [4] https://github.com/OSGeo/grass-addons/pull/853
> <https://github.com/OSGeo/grass-addons/pull/853>
> [5] https://github.com/OSGeo/grass-addons/pull/854
> <https://github.com/OSGeo/grass-addons/pull/854>
>
>
Best,
Nicklas
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
