Hi Vero, all, On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 7:19 PM Veronica Andreo <veroand...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Markus, > > El vie, 17 feb 2023 a las 15:25, Markus Neteler (<nete...@osgeo.org>) > escribió: >> >> Hi devs, >> >> After a long time of development and many, many improvements, it is >> time to release 8.3.0. >> >> Version scheme update: please note that we abandon the odd/even scheme >> and go for semantic versioning, i.e. 8.3.x comes after the 8.2.x >> series. See also the related RFC: Version Numbering >> (https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pull/2357). > > > Just wondering.. Should we adopt an RFC that has not yet been merged nor > approved via motion? There's a list of tasks in the PR that still seems > incomplete and I see that Vashek moved the milestone of the RFC to 8.4...
Not sure why a RFC should be related to a release milestone? > I'm not trying to delay the release -either it is called 8.3 or 8.4, it is > overdue- Overdue, yes. > but IMO we need to agree on the RFC, no? Shall I prepare a motion and we > approve a version 1 of the Version Numbering RFC? Yes, let's get this RFC approved and then follow our plan. thanks Markus _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
