Dear Luca, thank you for raising this issue,
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Luca Delucchi <lucadel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > with the upcoming GRASS 7 release we have to many branches to maintain > (releasebranch6, devbranch6, releasebranch7 and trunk). > Can I ask you to take a decision about the future of all this branches? > > I could suggest something like: > - keep releasebranch6 only for important bugfixes, no new feature and > starting to forget it > - put in reading mode or remove (after backport the differences with > grass64) devbranch6 > - releasebranch7 is the new stable release branch, so new features > only when we are far from release a new version > - trunk for new feature > > what do you think? > I'm in favor. Having too many branches from users point of view only raises confusion, and for developers is much more effort required to keep track of everything. My 2c Regards, Madi > > Thanks a lot > Best regards > > -- > ciao > Luca > > http://gis.cri.fmach.it/delucchi/ > www.lucadelu.org > _______________________________________________ > grass-psc mailing list > grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc > -- Best regards, Dr. Margherita DI LEO Scientific / technical project officer European Commission - DG JRC Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES) Via Fermi, 2749 I-21027 Ispra (VA) - Italy - TP 261 Tel. +39 0332 78 3600 margherita.di-...@jrc.ec.europa.eu Disclaimer: The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not in any circumstance be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission.
_______________________________________________ grass-psc mailing list grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc