+1 although I am wondering whether there should be some clarification that in
5. it is 51% of the members voting on this particular proposal (meaning that a vote from all PSC members is not needed to pass a proposal) "5. A proposal will be accepted if it receives majority (51% including the proposer) of votes (+1) and no vetoes (-1)." while in 8. we are talking about all members of PSC which is clearly stated there. "8.If a proposal is vetoed, and it cannot be revised to satisfy all parties, then it can be resubmitted for an override vote in which a majority of all eligible voters indicating +1 is sufficient to pass it. Note that this is a majority of all committee members, not just those who actively vote." If I understood this correctly then I assume other understand it as well and no modification is needed. Helena Helena Mitasova Associate Professor Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences 2800 Faucette Drive, Rm. 1125 Jordan Hall North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC 27695-8208 hmit...@ncsu.edu "All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.” On Jul 31, 2014, at 8:44 AM, Markus Neteler wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Margherita Di Leo <direg...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> shouldn't we be voting upon this new rules proposal at a certain stage? > > right! > > PSC [1]: are you all happy with this version? > http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/3_PSCVotingProcedures > > Markus > > [1] Members: http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/PSC > _______________________________________________ > grass-psc mailing list > grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc _______________________________________________ grass-psc mailing list grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
