I agree. Even if we cannot get time to look at it, we can at least check in and say that.
Michael ____________________ C. Michael Barton Director, Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity Professor of Anthropology, School of Human Evolution & Social Change Head, Graduate Faculty in Complex Adaptive Systems Science Arizona State University voice: 480-965-6262 (SHESC), 480-965-8130/727-9746 (CSDC) fax: 480-965-7671 (SHESC), 480-727-0709 (CSDC) www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton, http://csdc.asu.edu > On Dec 29, 2014, at 10:02 AM, Helena Mitasova <hmit...@ncsu.edu> wrote: > > I agree with Maris that no feedback should be interpreted as agreement. > A statement : "if there are no further comments or feedback for the 7 days, > RC1 will be released on XXX date" > may help in case somebody has some issues and was just delaying posting them. > > Also for the PSC, it appears that the release procedure is ready to be voted > on? > http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/4_ReleaseProcedure > > Helena > > > > On Dec 29, 2014, at 3:11 AM, Maris Nartiss wrote: > >> IMHO "lack of answer" in a transparent procedure with reasonable >> response windows just means "carry on, everyone agrees". Having a >> fixed last date for comments might force someone to say something (or >> used as an argument for STFU later). >> >> >> Just my 0.02, >> Māris. >> >> >> 2014-12-29 9:50 GMT+02:00 Markus Neteler <nete...@osgeo.org>: >>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Moritz Lennert >>> <mlenn...@club.worldonline.be> wrote: >>>> On 24/11/14 14:38, Martin Landa wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Dear all, >>>>> >>>>> as we are closer and closer to GRASS 7 release I would like to open >>>>> discussion related to "Release procedure" - RFC4 [1]. Ideally (I would >>>>> say) it would make sense to find a way how accept such procedure >>>>> before we start with GRASS RCs... >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for your feedback in advance! Martin >>>>> >>>>> [1] http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/4_ReleaseProcedure >>>> >>>> >>>> Rereading it I found parts that didn't seem clear, so I reordered the >>>> sentences slightly to make the meaning clearer. >>> >>> While this is all nice, I am strongly lacking support in the day to >>> day release management. >>> Again the RC1 feedback is actually 0 (zero). >>> >>> The "General Procedure" in the document is lacking answers to what to >>> do if no or no reasonable feedback occurs. >>> Any ideas? We are in soft freeze for months. >>> >>> Markus >>> _______________________________________________ >>> grass-dev mailing list >>> grass-...@lists.osgeo.org >>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> grass-dev mailing list >> grass-...@lists.osgeo.org >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev > > _______________________________________________ > grass-psc mailing list > grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc _______________________________________________ grass-psc mailing list grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc