Hi, Milena Nowotarska pisze: > Hi all, > > 2009/10/2 Jan Trochta <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > HI all, > Thank for colecction of your ideas and comments (expecially Milena and > Nikos) > >From your comment it seems that Pootle is not the best solution for us. > So next week I will try to register myself and grass to transifex and > try to make some howto for new translators. > Are you Ok with it? > > > Great. > But we still need a tool for translation online - as it states in > transifex FAQ [1], the translator can take the file and lock it, so > noone else would take it the same time. Translation need to be done on > desktop application. > Then the file have to be sent back to the project maintainer or > translation mamager, or attached to the upstream project's bug/ticket > reporting system. > If we coudn't find any better online translation tool, I would opt for > using pootle anyway. > > Last week I was testing Virtaal [2], desktop translation tool mentioned > by Robert. It is very *helpful* for the translator, perhaps the best > tool on windows platform now :)
Virtaal is probably multiplatform application written in Python. > > When we switch to transifex, we must not forget to update the wiki > messages translation page [3] so noone would take .po files directly > from svn ;) > > Cheers, > Milena > > [1] http://www.transifex.net/faq/ > [2] http://translate.sourceforge.net/wiki/virtaal/features > [3] http://grass.osgeo.org/wiki/GRASS_messages_translation Developers try to integrate Virtaal with Pootle. Additional online support for http://open-tran.eu/ seems to be long-term advantage. In my opinion we should test different tools. Then exchange pros and cons and decide. Otherwise we rely only upon web descriptions. Robert _______________________________________________ grass-translations mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-translations
