Craig Leat schrieb:
Philipp Steigenberger wrote:
 > Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 09:38:24 +0100
 > From: Philipp Steigenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > Subject: Re: [GRASS-user] a few suggestions and questions
 > To: "Carlos \"Gu?no\" Grohmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > Cc: grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
 > Carlos "Guâno" Grohmann schrieb:
 >> > Hello all
 >> >
>> > first I'd like to make a few suggestions to enhance (IMO) our favorite GIS:
 >> >
 >> > - normalize the options in all modules. I noticed that while most
 >> > commands take "--overwrite", some (r.neighbors) use "-o"
> I guess the problem is, that there are to many modules an it my be a lot of work to change them. Also "old" users are used to take the right option for the particular module. Another problem. Where to start? Some users have vers 6.2.3 others 6.3 svn others 6.3 rc5. If you change the manuals in the wiki all will be confused a little more, first of all the newbies. And finally there are also some parameters to be normalized. i.e most times you have >output< for output. but sometimes >out< or >elev< or >elevation<. So where to start and who will do?


Hi

Abbreviated options are optional not mandatory. Please see:
http://grass.gdf-hannover.de/wiki/Module_command_line_parser#Command_line_parser

IOW (elevation / elev / e) are all acceptable.

Regards

Craig


Craig,
I know this. It saves a lot of time only to type i.e.

d.v pointmap co=red s=3

instead of

d.vect map=pointsmap solor=red size=3

(note that I use aliases in addition in bash for the most important commands)

But sometimes you have the parameter "elev" like in v.surf.rst and sometimes "elevation" like in r.watershed. So if somebody tries to use "elevation" in v.surf.rst it doesn't work.
I don't care cause I try to shorten when ever I can ;o)

cheers
Philipp







_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user

Reply via email to