>Not sure if this is very critical, but I have noticed a problem with >r.shaded.relief. If the region is set to 10m and then a shaded rel. map is >produced from a 30m input data, a corrupt map is produced. > >example with spearfish data: > ># set region, and force 10m resolution >g.region rast=elevation.10m -p
I assume you meant g.region rast=elevation.10m res=10 -ap ? ># compute shaded rel. map from 30m res data: ># see image [1] >r.shaded.relief map=elevation.dem shade=shade I can't reproduce this. I can produce a Moire-patterned shaded-relief map, since I didn't resample the 30m data to 10m: ftp://gsca.nrcan.gc.ca/outgoing/Patton The command-line I used: g.region rast=elevation.dem res=10 -ap projection: 1 (UTM) zone: 13 datum: nad27 ellipsoid: clark66 north: 4928000 south: 4914020 west: 590010 east: 609000 nsres: 10 ewres: 10 rows: 1398 cols: 1899 cells: 2654802 r.shaded.relief map=elevation.dem shadedmap=elevation.dem.shade.10m Try r.resample first? ~ Eric. _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user