On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Rich Shepard <rshep...@appl-ecosys.com> wrote: > On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Markus Neteler wrote: > >> We have >> - 6.4.release-branch from which RC5 was extracted some months ago >> -> weekly source code and Linux binary snapshots are generated >> -> daily winGRASS binaries are generated > > Markus, > > Do I interpret the above that you extracted RC5 from the stable release? > > Here's the URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/DownloadSource#GRASS6.4> > and this is what I see: > > GRASS 6.4 > > To extract the current 6.4.0 release candidate 5 (RC5) use the command: > > svn checkout > https://svn.osgeo.org/grass/grass/tags/release_20090609_grass_6_4_0RC5 > grass640_rc5 > > To extract the current 6.4.x release branch version (stable) use the > command: > > svn checkout https://svn.osgeo.org/grass/grass/branches/releasebranch_6_4 > grass64_release
Now I understand your confusion. I have inverted the order and changed the wording to GRASS 6.4 To extract the current state of the 6.4.x release branch version (stable), use the command: svn checkout https://svn.osgeo.org/grass/grass/branches/releasebranch_6_4 grass64_release To extract the 6.4.0 release candidate 5 (RC5) from 2009, use the command: svn checkout https://svn.osgeo.org/grass/grass/tags/release_20090609_grass_6_4_0RC5 grass640_rc5 Does it make more sense now? > Are you developing both the stable and release candidate versions > simultaneously? Do both have identical code? If I want the patch you added > late last week which branch do I use? then use "the current state of the 6.4.x release branch" (so the upper after the modification). You can simply stay on that branch and update with svn up from time to time to fetch latest fixes. I am using that for my production systems. Markus _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user