On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Casey Vandenberg wrote:

I am trying to create a new project using a custom proj4 string. The parameters I specify are '+proj=utm +zone=6 +ellps=clark66 +towgs84=-5,135,172'. After creating the project however, and verifying the projection settings using *g.proj -j -f -p* I get the following info:

-PROJ_INFO-------------------------------------------------
name       : Universal Transverse Mercator
proj       : utm
ellps      : wgs84
zone       : 6
towgs84    : -5,135,172,0,0,0,0
no_defs    : defined
-PROJ_UNITS------------------------------------------------
unit       : Meter
units      : Meters
meters     : 1
+proj=utm +no_defs +zone=6 +a=6378137 +rf=298.257223563 +towgs84=-5,135,172,0,0,0,0 +to_meter=1

Why is it not maintaining the Clarke 1866 Elliposid?

clark66 is the GRASS abbreviation for that ellipsoid. When you define a co-ordinate system using a PROJ.4 string you need to use the PROJ.4 abbreviation, which is clrk66. So using +ellps=clrk66 should do what you want.

Alternatively, if I specify a proj 4 string as follows: '+proj=utm +zone=6 +datum=nad27 +towgs84=-5,135,172' and verify the created projection using g.proj, I get the following output:

-PROJ_INFO-------------------------------------------------
name       : Universal Transverse Mercator
proj       : utm
datum      : nad27
ellps      : clark66
zone       : 6
no_defs    : defined
-PROJ_UNITS------------------------------------------------
unit       : meter
units      : meters
meters     : 1
+proj=utm +no_defs +zone=6 +a=6378206.4 +rf=294.9786982 +towgs84=-22.000,157.000,176.000 +to_meter=1

Here it is maintaining the correct ellipsoid, but it does not maintain the towgs84 datum transformation parameters.

I'm not 100% sure of this (since the string is being interpreted by GDAL and not GRASS nor PROJ) but specifying +datum overrides both +ellps and +towgs84. You are correctly getting Clarke 66 since it is associated with NAD27, but specifying NAD27 seems to be overriding your towgs84 parameters. I suppose that isn't ideal - but seeing you can work around it by not specifying the datum, I guess it's OK.

Paul
_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user

Reply via email to