> That's right.
> The differences: r.le is the first implementation but unmaintained.
> r.li is a new implementation and somewhat maintained (just fixed
> a bug today). Hopefully more indices are added in future.
Thanks for clarifying. So r.li it is.

>> Follow up inquiry, how do I include the the patch stats to a vector
>> polygon?  For example, I have a watershed polygon and landcover
>> raster.  I want to include as an attribute, the largest interior patch
>> within each sub-basin.
>
> ... sorry, no idea. In any case "think raster" for this module family...

That's my line of thinking at the moment.



-- 
cheers,
maning
------------------------------------------------------
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user

Reply via email to