Stephen Sefick:
> > I saw a paper on this list the other day, but have deleted the original > > email. Is this the appropriate thing to cite when referring to GRASS > GIS in > > a paper? > > Markus Neteler: > You may cite as this: > > (from http://grass.osgeo.org/download/index.php) > > * GRASS Development Team, 2010. Geographic Resources Analysis Support > System (GRASS) Software, Version 6.4. Open Source Geospatial > Foundation. http://grass.osgeo.org > * GRASS Development Team, 2010. Geographic Resources Analysis Support > System (GRASS) Programmer's Manual. Open Source Geospatial Foundation. > Electronic document: http://grass.osgeo.org/programming6/ > > In three days time I will be submitting a paper to Geomorphology where the main research was made entirely with GRASS. I was willing to ask you: right now when I mention I used GRASS I refer to it like "... GRASS GIS (© 1999-2010 GRASS Development Team) version is 6.4.0svn and the main modules that compose ...." and then when I talk about a specific module I say like "....the minimum-watershed-size threshold was set to 100 cells (GRASS GIS 6.4.0svn Reference Manual, 2010)..." Is it correct? If so, should I use the same two aforementioned references at the reference list, but replacing "Programmer's Manual" by "Reference Manual"? Thanks for the help. I really want to do it right. Best, Marcello.
_______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user