Anna

Thanks for the quick response.  Of course, the data are in the specified 
file....... When I saw the screen output with the 'Elevation' header and no 
elevations, I assumed the operation had failed.  Looks like it terminated early 
though - I have about 7 miles of data from a 200 mile profile - are there any 
known limits on the length / resolution that can be handled?  I'll run it again 
and see what happens.

Stu


> On Jun 7, 2015, at 12:17 PM, Anna Petrášová <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Stuart Edwards <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Hi -
> 
> Great to see that r.profile is now working so well - at least in interactive 
> mode through the wxgui profile tool.  However, I'm having problems using 
> r.profile directly where I use a table of vector points to define the 
> profile.  r.profile reads the vector file and computes the transect lengths, 
> but does not appear to query the raster map at each point - or if it does, 
> the results are not printed.  Interactively, the raster map (DEM) works well 
> as the subject map for analysis.  Here's what is returned from r.profile:
> 
> r.profile input=DEM@mymaps output=profilepoints.csv file=pipe_sp.csv 
> resolution=10 units=feet
> Using resolution: 32.8084 [feet]
> Output columns:
> Along track dist. [feet], Elevation
> Approx. transect length: 951.007507 [feet]
> Approx. transect length: 1598.138340 [feet]
> Approx. transect length: 709.834684 [feet]
> Approx. transect length: 2040.197805 [feet]
> Approx. transect length: 113.646183 [feet]
> Approx. transect length: 259.883910 [feet]
> Approx. transect length: 333.752161 [feet]
> Approx. transect length: 871.612186 [feet]
> 
> You specified output file, so the profile elevation should be written into 
> that file profilepoints.csv. The rest of the output you see are only 
> messages. If you don't specify output parameter, you get the entire profile 
> on the standard output.
> 
> a minor problem is that even when the units are specified as 'feet', the 
> resolution is read as 'meters'.  Easy to work around - but could be confusing 
> if not noticed.
> 
> thanks for noticing, I will look into it 
> 
> Anna
> 
> Any assistance much appreciated.
> 
> Stu
> 
> GRASS 7.0.0 64 bit  2015-01-20 (Barton Binaries)
> Mac OS X 10.10.3
> MacBookPro 2014
> 
> _______________________________________________
> grass-user mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user 
> <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user>
> 

_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user

Reply via email to