On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Ken Mankoff <mank...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Martin and Paulo, > > I hadn't considered others might uses these scripts, but I guess it is worth > treating them as an extensions/addons as they might be generally useful. > > In this case, GRASS seems to have a fairly flat namespace. Do you recommend > keeping the grass naming scheme, or should I name my scripts, for example, > "kdm.d.rast.leg" (my initials are kdm) to reduce the chance of collision?
rather than initials the functionality should be reflected in the name, although that might be difficult. I would put it in the end like d.rast.leg.kdm or d.rast.legkdm Anna > > -k. > _______________________________________________ > grass-user mailing list > grass-user@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
