Trying to help those trying to help Rich: the tiling scheme is available in a web viewer here:
https://gis.dogami.oregon.gov/maps/lidarviewer/ the archive containing the data in question is available here: http://www.oregongeology.org/pubs/ldq/LDQ-45122C3.zip (1.8 GB) you need to patch together all bare earth coverages from all years in order to get a more complete coverage Markus M On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 8:27 PM, Daniel Victoria <daniel.victo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Rich, > > I was able to open your GRID in QGis. And if it works in QGis, it should > work in GRASS too. > > What I've seen is that most of you data has values -3.4028e+38 which > appears to be the NODATA value. So, are you sure this part of the data is > not a corner of the mapped area? Because there is valid data for the upper > and left borders. Also, this data is not a 1 x 1 degree rectangle, as you > said it should be. So this makes me believe that we are looking at just one > corner of the data, where it happens to have a lot of NODATA cells. > > Cheers > Daniel > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 3:17 PM Markus Metz <markus.metz.gisw...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 7:24 PM, Rich Shepard <rshep...@appl-ecosys.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > My problems are that pointing r.in.gdal to the hdr.adf files display >> only >> > the strange wedge/rectangle I attached to messages earlier in this >> thread. >> > They should be retangles for a full 1 degree x 1 degree topographic >> quad map >> > with colors varying by elevation. >> >> No, they should not. They cover a part of that rectangle. You need to >> patch coverages from different years together in order to get a more >> complete coverage. >> >> > >> > My need is to learn why I'm not getting clean imports of either >> bare_earth >> > or highest_hits for any of the three years of data. This is why this >> thread >> > has continued so long. The only option to r.in.gdal I've used is '-o' to >> > use the source's projection for the map. >> >> The -o flag of r.in.gdal overrides the source's projection for the map >> instead of using it. >> >> Markus M >> >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > >> > Rich >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > grass-user mailing list >> > grass-user@lists.osgeo.org >> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user >> >> _______________________________________________ >> grass-user mailing list >> grass-user@lists.osgeo.org >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user > > > _______________________________________________ > grass-user mailing list > grass-user@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user >
_______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user