Thanks a lot very good information and guidance. Thanks Gabriel On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 3:31 AM Nikos Alexandris <n...@nikosalexandris.net> wrote:
> * Gabriel Cotlier <gabikl...@gmail.com> [2018-08-21 12:00:24 -0300]: > > >I would like to ask if nonetheless the effect due to "stray light" the > >*i.landsat8.swlst* code for split window is still applicable to Landsat 8 > >data and whether these error is specially visible on water bodies? > > The implemented algorithm (Du, 2015) bases upon the generalized > split-window algorithm proposed by Wan (2014). The 'stray light' issue > is not dealt upfront with this approach. The 'stray light' issue is > dealt with an algorithmic correction introduced in the Collection 1 > products. And, of course, there might be more questions that relate to > the quality and performance of the algorithm by Du. > > Regarding "water bodies", I don't know. > > > >whether band 10 is better than band 11 in terms of correction processing > >for Level -1 data products? > > Band 10 is the one selected for the single-channel based LST products > that span across all Landsat sensors. See: "Landsat Provisional Surface > Temperature (ST) Digital Object Identification (DOI): > doi.org/10.5066/F7J38RTH". Band 11 is the one with large calibration > uncertainties. > > A good reference is this publication: > > Malakar, N. K., Hulley, G. C., Hook, S. J., Laraby, K., Cook, M., & > Schott, J. R. (2018). An Operational Land Surface Temperature Product > for Landsat Thermal Data: Methodology and Validation. IEEE Transactions > on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, (99), 1-19. > http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2824828. > > Nikos >
_______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
