Hi, I have an update on this. It seems to work if the vector file resides in the same mapset! I g.copied big_areas2@PERMANENT to current mapset and the excluded polygons are much less. It surely needs further investigation...
Kind regards, On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 4:50 PM Margherita Di Leo <direg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > excuse me if I return on this. I have again the same problem, of v.strds.stats > skipping lots of polygons. Now I'm using a brand new dataset - strds of > Sentinel 1 and a brand now vector of polygons - and the skipped polygons > are not narrow, I'm sure that there are cells centroids in it. See for > example screenshot attached, depicting a polygon that was skipped. I also > tried to run v.strds.stats on that polygon alone, like: > > v.strds.stats in=big_areas2@PERMANENT where="cat == '1'" > strds=db_cross_pol@scaled out=test method=average > > v.info test > > > +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | Name: test > | > | Mapset: stats > | > | Location: S1 > | > | Database: /media/madi/TOSHIBA EXT/S1/grassdata > | > | Title: Output from v.patch > | > | Map scale: 1:1 > | > | Name of creator: madi > | > | Organization: > | > | Source date: Fri Aug 9 12:12:49 2019 > | > | Timestamp (first layer): none > | > > > |----------------------------------------------------------------------------| > | Map format: native > | > > > |----------------------------------------------------------------------------| > | Type of map: vector (level: 2) > | > | > | > | Number of points: 0 Number of centroids: 0 > | > | Number of lines: 0 Number of boundaries: 0 > | > | Number of areas: 0 Number of islands: 0 > | > | > | > | Map is 3D: No > | > | Number of dblinks: 0 > | > | > | > | Projection: UTM (zone 34) > | > | > | > | N: 0 S: 0 > | > | E: 0 W: 0 > | > | > | > | Digitization threshold: 0 > | > | Comment: > | > | > | > > > +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > > I confess I hadn't look much further into it because I thought it was a > problem with nodata, but this is not the case and I think it's worth of > further investigation. Thanks for any pointers. > > Regards, > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 4:10 PM Margherita Di Leo <direg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Thanks for testing, Vero. I assume it's due to a local problem then. >> >> Cheers, >> >> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 3:29 PM Veronica Andreo <veroand...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Stefan and Madi, >>> >>> Thanks Stefan for the explanations :) Indeed I agree that a flag to >>> avoid the alignment to input rasters (and just use region settings) sounds >>> good. >>> I tested what Madi said, but cannot reproduce in the climate NC location >>> [0]. This is the command I used: >>> >>> v.strds.stats in=boundary_county where="cat == '261'" strds=tempmean >>> t_where="start_time >= '2012-01-01'" out=test >>> >>> to make it faster (it feels indeed kinda slow for the whole vector and >>> full time series), I selected only one polygon and a range of dates. I get >>> the table as expected while leaving methods by default. >>> >>> best, >>> Vero >>> >>> [0] >>> http://courses.ncsu.edu/mea592/common/media/02/nc_climate_spm_2000_2012.zip >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> El jue., 7 feb. 2019 a las 14:39, Margherita Di Leo (<direg...@gmail.com>) >>> escribió: >>> >>>> Thank you Stefan for your help! I figured what happens. v.strds.stats >>>> with default method produces in my case a corrupted output, topology is >>>> there but there's no table associated to it. If I specify method=average, I >>>> do obtain the table, and the mystery is solved: some of the polygons fall >>>> into a nodata (due to cloud mask). If anyone else can reproduce the >>>> corrupted table issue, I can file a ticket for that. >>>> >>>> Thanks for help! >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 12:33 PM Stefan Blumentrath < >>>> stefan.blumentr...@nina.no> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Madi, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> With this combination (polygon size vs. raster resolution), the shape >>>>> of the polygons can be an issue (narrow areas that do not cover the center >>>>> of any pixel). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Debugging should be simple with v.db.select or v.extract. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Areas that did not get rasterized should be NULL in the column with >>>>> statistics computed with v.rast.stats. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> In verbose mode v.rast.stats (or probably even v.to.rast) should >>>>> probably give a more informative Warning message (e.g. listing categories >>>>> not rasterized). It also would help if you can rasterize the areas >>>>> yourself >>>>> and provide a raster with categories as (optional) input to v.rast.stats… >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> For high resolution data like yours, the speed improvement of multiple >>>>> raster input might help quite a bit esp. with many maps in the time >>>>> series. >>>>> Will see if I can come up with a patch rather soon… >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> >>>>> Stefan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Margherita Di Leo <direg...@gmail.com> >>>>> *Sent:* torsdag 7. februar 2019 10:37 >>>>> *To:* Stefan Blumentrath <stefan.blumentr...@nina.no> >>>>> *Cc:* Veronica Andreo <veroand...@gmail.com>; grass-user < >>>>> grass-user@lists.osgeo.org> >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [GRASS-user] sample a strds at specific locations >>>>> (areas) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> thank you for your replies. To give a little more context: I selected >>>>> my polygon areas to be > 0.5 ha each (this would be 50000 mq if I'm not >>>>> mistaken) and I'm sampling NDVI maps at 10m resolution (the region being >>>>> the same as NDVI maps). So I think I need an idea on how to debug the >>>>> areas >>>>> that were excluded to check them individually to see what could be the >>>>> problem... >>>>> >>>>> Regarding the alignment problem, if I understand it correctly: if the >>>>> polygon doesn't include the *center* of the raster beneath it, can't >>>>> retrieve the value and the polygon is discarded? But a value exists, so it >>>>> would be correct that it returned a value in any case. But I admit I don't >>>>> have a full grasp of the problem. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 10:52 PM Stefan Blumentrath < >>>>> stefan.blumentr...@nina.no> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Vero, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I think there is a little misunderstanding. >>>>> >>>>> v.rast.stats did not change it behaviour with regards to the >>>>> computational region (at least not if only one raster map is used). The >>>>> alignment to the input raster (resolution) has been around since the >>>>> module >>>>> got ported to Python (like 10 years ago): >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/scripts/v.rast.stats/v.rast.stats.py?rev=33522#L148 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So, adding a flag for skipping the alignment was more an idea for an >>>>> enhancement that allows the behaviour you seem to prefer (too). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> >>>>> Stefan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Veronica Andreo <veroand...@gmail.com> >>>>> *Sent:* onsdag 6. februar 2019 21:38 >>>>> *To:* Stefan Blumentrath <stefan.blumentr...@nina.no> >>>>> *Cc:* Margherita Di Leo <direg...@gmail.com>; grass-user < >>>>> grass-user@lists.osgeo.org> >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [GRASS-user] sample a strds at specific locations >>>>> (areas) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I had a similar problem some time ago, just that it was not raster >>>>> resolution, but region resolution that I changed to solve my problem (see >>>>> this thread and MM's answer: >>>>> http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/v-to-rast-for-polygons-not-overlapping-center-of-raster-cell-td5355686.html#a5355729 >>>>> ) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> IIUC, MM's proposed solution to my case then does not work anymore >>>>> because v.to.rast call inside v.rast.stats is affected by the region >>>>> alignment to the raster to be queried. So, the solution is indeed now, to >>>>> change raster resolution... ? Then the region would be aligned to it >>>>> (them)? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If one has large areas or long time series and has to resample all >>>>> rasters to get smallish polygons rasterized, I do not see the advantage of >>>>> this new behavior... but maybe I'm missing something >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> Vero >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> El mié., 6 feb. 2019 16:54, Stefan Blumentrath < >>>>> stefan.blumentr...@nina.no> escribió: >>>>> >>>>> Ciao Madi, Vero, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Starting with GRASS 7.6, also centroids are used to get the raster >>>>> representation of your area vector map. That increases the likelihood of >>>>> smaller areas to be rasterized. >>>>> >>>>> Increasing the resolution of the current region alone does not help, >>>>> because v.rast.stats temporarily changes the computational region to align >>>>> with the input raster map(s) (see also: >>>>> https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/3523 and >>>>> https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/3598 for discussion) Even if the >>>>> first ticket is closed, comments are welcome. >>>>> >>>>> It might make sense to add a flag to v.rast.stats like in >>>>> r.slope.aspect to not align the computational region. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Furthermore, with regards to efficiency, v.strds.stats could gain some >>>>> speed if multi-raster support in v.rast.stats - added in G 7.6 - would be >>>>> handed down to the addon. Might almost double the speed for larger STRDS… >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> >>>>> Stefan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* grass-user <grass-user-boun...@lists.osgeo.org> *On Behalf Of >>>>> *Veronica Andreo >>>>> *Sent:* onsdag 6. februar 2019 17:20 >>>>> *To:* Margherita Di Leo <direg...@gmail.com> >>>>> *Cc:* GRASS user list <grass-user@lists.osgeo.org> >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [GRASS-user] sample a strds at specific locations >>>>> (areas) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Madi >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> El mié., 6 feb. 2019 a las 16:31, Margherita Di Leo (< >>>>> direg...@gmail.com>) escribió: >>>>> >>>>> I have a question regarding v.strds.stats. I get the following warning >>>>> message: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> WARNING: Not all vector categories converted to raster. Converted 120 >>>>> of 265. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> What could be the reason for that? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Some vector areas might not be converted because they are too small >>>>> with respect to the pixel size that you try to query. Others will tell >>>>> better but I think the polygon must overlap the center of the pixel in >>>>> order to be converted into raster. One solution could be to resample your >>>>> rasters to a higher resolution. >>>>> >>>>> HTH, >>>>> >>>>> Vero >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> Margherita Di Leo >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Margherita Di Leo >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Margherita Di Leo >> > > > -- > Margherita Di Leo > -- Margherita Di Leo
_______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user