On 27/01/22 14:01, ilaria.ferrand...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Moritz,
thank you for your reply.
I tried with and without the -r flag and the results is the same.

I reformulate this part of the question then: what exactly is the content of immagine@mapset ? Please provide the output of

r.info map=immagine@mapset

Please find attached the parameters of the file 22giugno2020_b4.txt:

26
6 22 17.05 9.68728523 43.75514951
2
1
0
-0.293

Are you sure this should be a negative number ? This should be visibility in km IIRC.

-1000
182


Moritz

-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Moritz Lennert <mlenn...@club.worldonline.be>
Inviato: giovedì 27 gennaio 2022 13:22
A: Ilaria Ferrando <ilaria.ferrand...@gmail.com>; Maris Nartiss 
<maris....@gmail.com>
Cc: GRASS user list <grass-user@lists.osgeo.org>
Oggetto: Re: [GRASS-user] NULL values as output of i.atcorr

On 26/01/22 19:50, Ilaria Ferrando wrote:
Dear Māris,
Thank you for your reply.
Yes, the image is inside the computational region.
Any other ideas?


1) Are you sure your input data is reflectance (-r flag used) ?
2) Could you provide us with the contents of the 22giugno2020_b4.txt file ?

Moritz


Il mer 26 gen 2022, 19:45 Maris Nartiss <maris....@gmail.com
<mailto:maris....@gmail.com>> ha scritto:

     One thing to always check – does your computational region contain
     data you are analysing? Try to run `g.region rast=immagine` before
     running i.atcorr.

     Māris.

     trešd., 2022. g. 26. janv., plkst. 18:13 — lietotājs
     <ilaria.ferrand...@gmail.com <mailto:ilaria.ferrand...@gmail.com>>
     rakstīja:
      >
      > Dear all,
      >
      > I am having troubles in processing a Sentinel-2 image with i.atcorr.
      >
      > The command I use is the following:
      >
      > i.atcorr -r -input=immagine@mapset range=0,10000
     parameters=C:\...\22giugno2020_b4.txt output=immagine_atcorr rescale=0,1
      >
      > and I obtain this output:
      >
      > wavelength less than 0.25 micron:
      >
      > let's take s(l)=s(0.25)
      >
      > Atmospheric correction...
      >
      > Atmospheric correction complete.
      >
      >
      >
      > The map I obtain is constituted by pixels with 6.669033e-34 values.
      >
      > Can anyone explain the meaning of the output and why I obtain a
     NULL value corrected map?
      >
      > Thank you for your support.
      >
      >
      >
      > _______________________________________________
      > grass-user mailing list
      > grass-user@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:grass-user@lists.osgeo.org>
      > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
     <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user>


_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user



_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user

Reply via email to