Enhanced Features: Cap: The Cap command now provides more useful information when it fails to cap a hole. RecordAnimation: RenderFull method can now be canceled with the Esc key. RoundHole: The Radius option now gets the keyboard input by default.
As I said, I now wouldn't think them as the new features Grasshopper should follow up with. I guess I could assume that rhino SDK function signature is stable between service releases? -Patrick On Feb 9, 12:47 pm, David Rutten <[email protected]> wrote: > Which 3 features? If an SDK function was fixed then it will > automatically work in Grasshopper as well. If a new function was added > to the SDK (which is by no means a guarantee, an addition is more > likely to be available only as a new command) then I can do something > with it in Grasshopper. > > -- > David Rutten > [email protected] > Robert McNeel & Associates > > On Feb 9, 6:03 pm, Patrick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I originally thought that grasshopper may come up with new wrappers > > forSR5enhanced features. But maybe not necessary for the three new > > features listed. So, I should have asked "when will next update of > > grasshopper" come out?". Thanks -Patrick. > > > On Feb 9, 9:36 am, David Rutten <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Patrick, > > > > why would you want it to specifically targetSR5? > > > > -- > > > David Rutten > > > [email protected] > > > Robert McNeel & Associates > > > > On Feb 9, 3:26 pm, Patrick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > David, > > > > > Roughly when will we expect the new grasshopper especially targeting > > > > the rhinoSR5? > > > > > Thanks > > > > Patrick > > > > > On Feb 5, 5:31 pm, David Rutten <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > well, I have no idea what's going on and since the version I'm using > > > > > is build on radically different source code, I guess there's little > > > > > point in trying to track it down. > > > > > Once the new version is out, if the problem still persists, we can > > > > > start an extensive performance logging iteration to see where most of > > > > > the cycles are used. > > > > > > -- > > > > > David Rutten > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > Robert McNeel & Associates > > > > > > On Feb 5, 5:26 pm, urbansurgery <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > nope > > > > > > > same delay in operation no matter what component added (or deleted) > > > > > > regardless of connection > > > > > > > On Feb 5, 12:39 pm, David Rutten <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > US, > > > > > > > > is the "Delay Rhino Updates" option in the View menu on or off? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > David Rutten > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > Robert McNeel & Associates > > > > > > > > On Feb 5, 11:36 am, urbansurgery <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > geometry and rhino viewport same as before > > > > > > > > > but dragging or adding components to the grasshopper window > > > > > > > > while > > > > > > > > responsive to Grasshopper events is laggy - even before > > > > > > > > conneting rto > > > > > > > > anythign else > > > > > > > > > On Feb 4, 4:33 pm, David Rutten <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Are you referring to the speed of the Canvas redraw, the Rhino > > > > > > > > > viewport redraw or the speed at which grasshopper generates > > > > > > > > > geometry? > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > David Rutten > > > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > Robert McNeel & Associates > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 4, 5:07 pm, urbansurgery <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Difficult to benchmark this but grasshopper operation seems > > > > > > > > > > a lot more > > > > > > > > > > sluggish underSR5than SR4b. > > > > > > > > > > > Is there anything likely to cause this?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
