> 1. The inability to create paths is severely limiting. Right now the > pathing structure is whatever gets kicked out of components, and that > pathing structure may not be what is needed. Even just 1d paths for > now would be a great addition.
Yep. More components will be made soon. > 2. The output of the paths at this point is somewhat clunky. Right > now I'm getting what looks like 1 dimensional paths from some > components and what look to be two dimensional paths from another > component. I'm even seeing one that looks 3 dimensional now?! Whenever data flows through a component that potentially outputs multiple values for a single input (Divide will create a bunch of points on a single curve, Plane|Line Intersect might have multiple intersection points for a single line, Join Curves might result in multiple loose curves) the data path gets an extra number. So yes, having paths with even as many as ten nested levels is not unthinkable. -- David Rutten [email protected] Robert McNeel & Associates
